| Author |
Message |
hypno-therapist Site Moderator

Joined: 30 Nov 2006 Posts: 884 Location: Witney UK
|
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 5:32 pm Post subject: Who is the cleverer? |
|
|
Hi All,
This question is aimed at no particular therapy!
Who is the cleverer? The guy who understands the lack of science behind a particular therapy and therefore it doesn't work on him. Or a person that is open minded and allows the process to work.
Also is it ethical for a therapist to practice a therapy that he knows full well is just a placebo?
I have my thoughts on this, but what are yours? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 |
Paddy Landau Site Moderator

Joined: 30 Nov 2006 Posts: 490 Location: Oxford, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 9:10 am Post subject: Re: Who is the cleverer? |
|
|
I think the cleverest is the one who understands the lack of science and allows it to work anyway. Fortunately, more research is being done on the various therapies.
| hypno-therapist wrote: | | is it ethical for a therapist to practice a therapy that he knows full well is just a placebo? |
I would turn this around. Knowing that placebos work better than certain drugs (for example), is it ethical for a doctor or therapist not to use placebos in those cases?
To my knowledge, doctors aren't allowed to prescribe placebos, so they often have to prescribe drugs that don't work as well and cause unwanted side effects.
Paddy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hypno-therapist Site Moderator

Joined: 30 Nov 2006 Posts: 884 Location: Witney UK
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You seem to have a thing about doctors
When you get a moment please give us some examples of drugs that are less effective than placebos. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PhoenixDawn Site Moderator

Joined: 16 Apr 2007 Posts: 100 Location: Nottinghamshire UK
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
The person who is aware of the lack of science and is open to allow it to work will always be the winner. As research has shown, so many times, that the belief of the individual plays such a dynamic part in whether any kind of treatment will work on them, then healing or change is ultimately down to the stronghold of the mind.
Look at the research undertaken with patients dying of cancer. The mindset of those who are told they have, say, three months to live. A good number will die within that time-scale, almost to the day they were told. Others will insist that the doctors are wrong and go on to live much longer. There's so much evidence to show that if someone 'decides' they will get well or otherwise, they will achieve exactly that which they set out to do. And I can stand testimony to this with personal experience.
So, even a client who does understand the science behind a therapy, and yet still chooses to belief it will work for others though not for them personally, is more likely to achieve little or no result.
Therefore, if a therapist utilises a placebo, in the knowledge that the client has a strong belief in the placebo, then the positive outcome for the client is really what's being aimed for. Professionally and ethically, the argument is one to be very carefully considered in the age of litigation.
Hmmm, will be interested to see what else gets posted here.
Paddy, when did the laws change re placebos? I may be out of touch, but I thought they often did prescribe placebos? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hypno-therapist Site Moderator

Joined: 30 Nov 2006 Posts: 884 Location: Witney UK
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| PhoenixDawn wrote: | | Look at the research undertaken with patients dying of cancer. |
I'd love to! Where can I get my hands on the research that you mention?
| PhoenixDawn wrote: | | Paddy, when did the laws change re placebos? I may be out of touch, but I thought they often did prescribe placebos? |
You're not alone, I thought that they still did too!
Oh and welcome to the forum  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PhoenixDawn Site Moderator

Joined: 16 Apr 2007 Posts: 100 Location: Nottinghamshire UK
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the welcome.
It's been a while since I read up on the cancer research and a lot of my stuff is buried in the spare room right now waiting for new bookcases after the flood damage. We were finally declared dry last week after 3 months. Needless to say, I didn't lose a single book as they were my priority for rescue! OCD perhaps?
Give me some time, and I'll aim to dig it all out and send you the details. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hypno-therapist Site Moderator

Joined: 30 Nov 2006 Posts: 884 Location: Witney UK
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi PhoenixDawn,
Thanks for that.
Sorry to hear that you got hit by the floods. We were quite lucky as the water stopped about 20 meters from our front door.
I will look forward to you posting the research when you get the time to dig through the spare room for it.
Oh... don't forget to introduce yourself in the section at the top of this forum. It would be great to know a bit of your background - its always nice to be able to put a story to the name.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paddy Landau Site Moderator

Joined: 30 Nov 2006 Posts: 490 Location: Oxford, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| hypno-therapist wrote: | | When you get a moment please give us some examples of drugs that are less effective than placebos. |
Hmm... Pity I have not saved the articles I've read.
I know that I've read cases where placebo has returned better results than some drug. I've also read, "FDA doesn't require that a drug study include a placebo control group" (The Healing Power of Placebos). This goes against what I learned at university about about doing a valid medical experiment.
In some cases, bizarrely, placebos had the opposite effect: Taking a placebo made the problem worse. Testing for the effects of food additives, "Some parents noticed changes when their children received both the additives and the placebo, while others saw behaviour deteriorate with the placebo but not the additives." (The Economist, 13 Sep 2007).
| PhoenixDawn wrote: | | Paddy, when did the laws change re placebos? I may be out of touch, but I thought they often did prescribe placebos? |
I had read that this was the case. However, it might have been for a different country. If I'm wrong, I stand corrected.
Mind you, how many doctors would admit to prescribing placebos? How would that stand in a court of law?
It can get quite funny, though...
| Placebo@Everything2.com wrote: | Richard Bandler, psychologist and founder of NLP, and his associates decided to utilize the placebo effect and market a product called Placebo. They looked over all the research studies that used a placebo, and found that placebo had a noticeable effect on the condition it was used for about 10% of the time. Given the established effectiveness of placebos, they went ahead to seek FDA approval for their drug, Placebotm. The product would come with a booklet telling how many of Placebo to take for any given problem: for example, if studies had shown a placebo to be 25% as effective as Paxil for treating Major Depression, then you would take 5 placebo to make sure it would be effective (5x25% = 125%). The FDA refused to consider allowing Bandler and his associates to market the drug, and placebo remains a product used mostly in research studies.
Placebo@Everything2.com |
Paddy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PhoenixDawn Site Moderator

Joined: 16 Apr 2007 Posts: 100 Location: Nottinghamshire UK
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Richard and Paddy
Well, I'm managing to get back around to books as the house continues to be repaired - so here's a list of initial places on this subject - finally and in no particular order:
Stephanie Matthews-Simonton, O. Carl Simonton, and James L Creighton Getting Well Again (New York Bantam Books 19809)
Jeanne Achterberg, Mind and Medicine: The Role of Imagery in Healing ASPR Newsletter 14, No 3 June 1988
And Boston, Mass: New Science Library 1985
Bernie S Siegal Love, Medicine, and Miracles (New York, Harper and Row 1986
Mary Orser and Richard Zarrim Changing Your Destiny (New York Harper and Row 1989
Barbara Brown Supermind: The Ultimate Energy (New York Harper and Row 1980)
Larry Dossey Space, Time and Medicine (Boston, Mass: New Science Library 1982)
Brendan ORegan Healing, Remission and Miracle Cures Institute of Noetic Sciences Special Report May 1987
Steven Lock and Douglas Colligan The Healer Within (New York, New American Library 1986)
Bruno Klopfer Psychological Variables in Human Cancer Journal of Prospective Techniques 31 1957
Richard Alpert Be Here Now - (San Cristoal, NM: Lama Foundation 1971)
Lyall Watson Beyond Supernature (New York, Bantam Booiks 1988
Alfred Stelter Psi-Healing (New York, Bantam books 1976)
Apologies that it took me so long to get this far!
Dawn  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gandalf 10% Member

Joined: 09 Oct 2007 Posts: 276
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:05 pm Post subject: OR |
|
|
Is this the same question, or different?
*Putting on Obi Wan Kenobi voice*
"Who is the more foolish, the fool, or the fool that follows the fool?"
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
R1986 Starter Member

Joined: 07 Feb 2008 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Well if a placebo is going to work in place of a prescription medication then it is my belief that the 'mental cure' is a much better solution than altering body chemistry. I can't say who is more clever in the first question asked but I wanted to voice in on the placebo versus drug aspect of this discussion at least. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|